25 Idioms About Bread and Dessert

25 Idioms About Bread and Dessert 25 Idioms About Bread and Dessert 25 Idioms About Bread and Dessert By Mark Nichol Wheat the staff of life and the baked products derived from it invite many idiomatic associations. Here are references to bread and other flour-based products in phrases and expressions. 1. â€Å"Bread and butter† refers to the basics in life. 2. â€Å"Bread and water† refers to the bare minimum of food and drink, based on the traditional punitive prison diet. 3. â€Å"The greatest thing since sliced bread† is something considered revolutionary and indispensable. 4. â€Å"Half a loaf is better than none† means that one shouldn’t complain about not having everything, because it is better to have something than nothing. 5. â€Å"Half baked† means â€Å"incomplete† or â€Å"not thoroughly planned or conceived.† 6. To know â€Å"which side (one’s) bread is buttered on† is to recognize what is advantageous. 7. To â€Å"sell (something) like hotcakes† is to be very successful at selling something. 8. To â€Å"separate the wheat from the chaff† is to distinguish what is useful or valuable from what is not. 9. Something that is â€Å"as flat as a pancake† is extremely flat. 10. Something â€Å"as warm as toast† is very warm and comforting. 11. To â€Å"have your cake and eat it, too† is to have or accomplish something more than one way; the phrase often refers to an unrealistic expectation. 12. Something â€Å"as easy as (apple) pie† is very simple to do or understand. 13–14. To â€Å"have (one’s) finger in the pie† is to be involved, but to â€Å"have (one’s) fingers in too many pies† is to be committed in too many endeavors, thus reducing one’s effectiveness. 15. â€Å"Icing on the cake† is an additional benefit. 16. An activity that is â€Å"like taking candy from a baby† is very easy. 17. Something that is â€Å"pie in the sky† is unrealistic. 18. Something that is â€Å"a piece of cake† is extraordinarily easy. 19. To get â€Å"a piece of the pie† is to be among those who earn an advantage or reward. 20. To â€Å"sugarcoat† something is to put it into a deceptively or inaccurately positive light. 21. Something that â€Å"takes the cake† is significantly better or worse than other comparable things; the phrase often refers to an action or comment that is audaciously irritating. 22. â€Å"That’s the way the cookie crumbles† means that what is referred to is an expected or typical outcome. 23. Someone or something â€Å"as nutty as a fruitcake† is crazy or ridiculous. 24. Something â€Å"as slow as molasses (in January)† is very slow. 25. Something â€Å"as sweet as honey† is very appealing. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:How Many Tenses in English?Ten Yiddish Expressions You Should KnowPunctuation Is Powerful

Doc Holliday Biography

Doc Holliday Biography Doc Holliday (born John Henry Holliday, August 14, 1851- November 8, 1887) was  an American  gunfighter, gambler, and dentist.  A  friend of fellow gunslinger  and  lawman  Wyatt Earp, Holliday became an iconic  character  of the  American Wild West  through  his role in the  gunfight at the O.K.  Corral.  Despite his reputation for  having gunned down  Ã¢â‚¬Å"dozens† of men, more recent research suggests Holliday killed no more than two men.  Over the years, Holliday’s character and  life have been depicted in many movies and television series. Fast Facts: Doc Holliday Full Name:  John Henry (Doc) Holliday  Known For:  Old West American gambler, gunfighter, and dentist. Friend of Wyatt Earp  Born:  August 14, 1851, in Griffin, GeorgiaDied:  November 8, 1887, in  Glenwood Springs, ColoradoParents:  Henry Holliday and Alice Jane (McKey) HollidayEducation:  Pennsylvania College of Dental Surgery, D.D.S. Degree, 1872  Key Accomplishments:  Fought beside Wyatt Earp against the Clanton Gang in the Gunfight at the OK Corral. Accompanied Wyatt Earp on his Vendetta Ride  Spouse:  Big Nose Kate  Horony  (common-law)  Famous Quote:  Ã¢â‚¬Å"All I want of you is ten paces out in the street.† (to gunfighter Johnny Ringo).   Early Life and Education     Doc Holliday was born on August 14, 1851, in Griffin, Georgia, to Henry Holliday and Alice Jane (McKey) Holliday. A veteran of both the  Mexican–American War  and the  Civil War, Henry Holliday taught his son  to shoot.  In 1864, the family moved to Valdosta, Georgia, where Doc attended first through tenth grade at the private Valdosta Institute.  Considered an outstanding student, Holliday excelled at  rhetoric, grammar, mathematics, history,  and Latin.   Doc Holliday. John van Hasselt / Getty Images In 1870, the 19-year-old Holliday moved to Philadelphia,  where he received a Doctor of Dental Surgery degree from the Pennsylvania College of Dental Surgery on March 1, 1872.   Holliday Heads  West   In July 1872,  Holliday joined a  dental practice in Atlanta,  but was soon diagnosed with tuberculosis. Hoping the drier climate would help  his condition, he moved to Dallas, Texas, eventually opening his own dental practice. As his  coughing spells increased and his dental patients abandoned him, Holliday turned to gambling to support himself. After having been arrested twice for illegal gambling  and being acquitted of murder, he left Texas in January 1875. Gambling his  way west through states and cities where betting was treated as a legal profession, Holliday settled  in  Dodge City, Kansas, in the spring of 1878. It was in Dodge City  that Holliday befriended assistant city marshal Wyatt Earp.  Though there were no reports of the incident in the  Dodge City newspapers, Earp credited Holliday for saving his life during a shootout with outlaws at the  Long Branch Saloon.   The Gunfight at the O.K. Corral   In  September  1880, Holliday  rejoined  his friend Wyatt Earp  in the wild and booming silver mining camp town of Tombstone,  Arizona  Territory.  Then a  Wells Fargo  stagecoach  security agent, Wyatt joined  his brothers, Deputy U.S. Marshal Virgil Earp, and Morgan  Earp as Tombstone’s â€Å"police force.†Ã‚  In Tombstone’s gambling  and liquor-fueled atmosphere, Holliday soon became involved in the violence that would result in the  Gunfight at  the O.K. Corral.   Opposing the  Earps  for control of Tombstone  was the infamous  Clanton Gang, a  group of  local  cowboys  led by  the notorious cattle rustlers  and murderers  Ike Clanton and Tom  McLaury. On  October 25, 1881,  Ike  Clanton and  Tom  McLaury  came to town for supplies. Over the  course of the  day, they had several  violent  confrontations with the Earp brothers. On the morning of October 26,  Ike’s brother Billy Clanton  and Tom’s brother Frank  McLaury, along with gunfighter Billy Claiborne,  rode to town to provide backup for Ike and Tom. When Frank  McLaury  and Billy  Clanton learned that the  Earps  had  just  pistol-whipped their brothers, they  vowed revenge. At  3 p.m. on October 26, 1881, the  Earps  and  the hastily-deputized  Holliday faced the Clanton-McLaury  gang behind the OK Corral. In the 30-seconds of gunfire that ensued, Billy Clanton and both  McLaury  brothers were killed.  Doc Holliday, and Virgil and Morgan Earp were wounded. While he was present at the gunfight, Ike Clanton was unarmed and fled the scene. Though a territorial court found that the  Earps  and Holliday had  acted within their duties as lawmen at the O.K. Corral, Ike Clanton was not satisfied. In the following  weeks, Morgan Earp was killed and Virgil Earp was permanently maimed by a group of unknown cowboys.  In what has become known as the  Earp Vendetta Ride, Holliday joined Wyatt Earp as part of a federal posse that pursued the suspected outlaws  for over a year, killing four of them.   Later Life  and Death  in  Colorado   Holliday moved to Pueblo, Colorado, in  April 1882.  In May, he was arrested  for the murder of Frank Stilwell, one of the cowboys he had chased down while riding with Wyatt Earp’s federal posse. When Earp learned of the arrest, he arranged  to have the request to extradite Holliday  to Arizona  denied.  Ã‚   In the winter of 1886,  Holliday met his old friend Wyatt Earp for a final time in the lobby of the Windsor Hotel in Denver. Earp’s common-law wife Sadie Marcus later described  Holliday as a constantly-coughing skeleton standing on â€Å"unsteady legs.†Ã‚  Ã‚   Holliday spent the last year of his life in Colorado, dying of tuberculosis in his bed at the Glenwood Springs Hotel on November 8, 1887, at age 36.  He  is  buried in Linwood Cemetery overlooking Glenwood Springs, Colorado.   Legacy   One of the best-recognized characters of the American Old West, Doc Holliday is remembered for his friendship with Wyatt Earp.  In an 1896 article, Wyatt Earp said  of Holliday:   â€Å"I found him a loyal friend and good company. He was a dentist whom necessity had made a gambler; a gentleman whom disease had made a vagabond; a philosopher whom life had made a caustic wit; a long, lean blonde fellow nearly dead with consumption and at the same time the most skillful gambler and nerviest, speediest, deadliest man with a six-gun I ever knew.†Ã‚   Sources and  Further Reference Roberts, Gary L. (2006).  Doc Holliday: The Life and Legend.  John Wiley and Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-26291-9  Doc Holliday- Deadly Doctor of the American West. Legends of America.  Ã‚  OK Corral. History.net  Urban, William L. (2003).  Ã¢â‚¬Å"Tombstone. Wyatt Earp: The Ok Corral and the Law of the American West.† The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-8239-5740-8.

Literary analysis for Grief Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Literary analysis for Grief - Essay Example The cruel hand of death was seen with just a mere act of coming together to have dinner. The event was simply beyond her understanding. According to her, life can change instantly. Her words can be taken to be mute. She could not describe what happened at that time until nine months afterwards. Her account can be best described as a great work of testimony, reach in power, grace and generosity as Joan emerges from grief. The unbelievable contrast between the ordinary circumstances and the extraordinary event that comes afterwards goes round and round Joan’s minds. She tries to reconnect events like death with grief. She meditates on family life and children. How people become sick and how they heal afterwards. She gets into deep thought on how human beings takes life normal, may be thinking that death is far away. She generally gets to view life from another perspective. Joan loved her husband so much that when death snatched him from her, she becomes deeply affected and canno t imagine how cruel life is sometimes destined to be. They had had a happy life for over forty years. Their idea of marriage was working together and cooperation. They worked for thirty five years together at home. The couples shared a lot, depended on each other so much and paid attention to one another’s ideas and thoughts. ... People have the notion that a close relative or friend can die but the thoughts given to the events that are likely to follow are very small or not matching the magnitude of responsiveness a person can show. We only expect that one may just have a mere shock on receiving news of death but there is more to it than that, there is a heavy effect it leaves on both the mind and the body. As she describes the difference between real grief and the mere thoughts of grief, great powers of her reflections are shown. According to her, as days pass by, the effects of grief reduce unlike the earlier days. According to her, the common belief that a funeral is the heightened moment of grief, is unreality. This is because a funeral is just a celebration that must occur to give a chance for others to pay their last respect to the deceased, but those affected will still be undergoing the reality of living without the deceased; a time of meaninglessness in life . In giving her account on grief, Joan co mpares and contrasts two angels of looking at grief: individual and universal perspective. Since she was a child, Joan understood that change cannot be avoided and that nature shall always be the same. In her opinion this is even captured in the payer that God’s glory will always be. The challenge that comes is balancing the fact that everyone will face death and the meaning of existence. Self pity is another component of grief that is contemplated in her testimony of grief. After careful analysis of events that come with grief, Joan is of the opinion that having self pity is normal. Self-pity is a natural phenomenon. She accepts that one can only learn and understand life’s ways given time and experiences. It leaves one a completely changed perception. (De Beauvoir

Media ethicss Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Media ethicss - Essay Example For Aristotle, proper understanding of and grateful attitude towards wealth, honor, virtue, pleasure, and friendship is what is needed for human to live well. Through appropriate behavior and good upbringing, one must learn the ability to understand, choose, and decide which conduct is best for an occasion. This, of course, should be supported by logical reasoning --- a power that all human beings are capable of. Aristotle also believes that practical wisdom cannot be acquired by following general guidelines. Through practice, every individual should learn the social, emotional, and reflective skills that allow him/her to act in ways that are appropriate for each unique event (Bertrand, 22). Per Kant, it is the cause for doing a certain action, rather than the outcome of the deed, that gives it a moral value. Kant's renowned statement regarding duty is "Act according to the belief that you choose and can do so as to make it your entire principle." (Bertrand, 45) On the other hand, countering Kant's principle on ethics is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the thought that a behavior's role in producing advantage for all is the moral value of the deed. Advantage for all involves the summed pleasure or satisfaction for everybody. It means that the outcome establishes the value of any behavior --- the ends justify the means (Bertrand, 25). PluralPluralism Pluralism is about different values. This ethics model asserts that there are several differing values existing in a diversely peopled world. These values are called duties, and they are unspoken guidelines so every individual's behavior will not threaten other people's happiness and life (Patterson and Wilkins, 12). This ethics model acknowledges the unique roles people play in their every day lives, and the similarly differing values people believe in based on these diverse roles in the society (Bertrand, 29). Commutarianism Commutarianism, on the other hand, places social equality as its guiding principle (Patterson and Wilkins, 14). As every individual is a part of a larger society, it asserts that every one should be sensitive to the consequences of their every action. These actions, must be beneficial not only for themselves, but for the entire society. Communitarianism stresses the relationship of the individual to the society and the correlation of the different social systems --- economic, legal, etc. This ethics model is applicable in evaluating the role of the media in the society, since per Patterson and Wilkins, it enhances the accomplishments of the media as a whole and eliminates possible rivalry among them (15). Surname 3 Ethical Issues in Reporting the Truth Chapter 2: "Taste in Photojournalism" and "Too many Bodies, Too Much Blood" In this case studies, the media had a hard time reporting the truth due to differences in moral sensibilities. A photo journalist may have a hard time distinguishing what is right and moral and what is considerate and moral. Pluralism is very obvious in this case study as different individuals who play different roles may value things at different levels. What may be deemed as a responsible publishing of a photo to warn society may be considered harsh or insensitive towards the feelings of the photo's

Themes Of Rivalry In East Of Eden

Themes Of Rivalry In East Of Eden John Steinbeck was born into a middle class family that resided in Salinas, California. During his time at Stanford University Steinbeck worked and took classes he believed were beneficial before eventually dropping out. Steinbeck first widely known novel was Tortilla Flat written in 1935, about a series of humorous situations a group of piasanos get themselves into (John Steinbeck 1). In 1921, Steinbeck wrote East of Eden a novel that deals with the complex battle between good and evil. The story interweaves Steinbecks actual family history with that of a second fictional family the Trasks. The multiple complications that arise in the story replicate those of the biblical story Cain and Abel. Steinbeck on countless occasions indicated that this novel was his most prized piece of writing, mainly due to its applicable significance. The narrators opinion in East of Eden goes so further than just to propose the story of Cain and Able is the recurring narrative of human history, but affirms that there is no other story (411). The narrator continues stating that every individual since Adam and Eve has wrestled with the meticulous choice between good and evil. When looking back on his or her life, the narrator contests each person has one question to ask, will have left only the hard, clean questions: Was it good or was it evil? Have I done well-or ill (411). Steinbecks frank unveiling of his worldview roots itself deeper than just the narrator. Lee, in East of Eden, states that the story of Cain and Abel is the symbol story of the human soul (268). However, Steinbecks kibitzing on humanitys symbol story is skewed by his conclusion. Steinbeck concludes that while life is a struggle between choosing good and evil, we make our own path. The symbol story of humanity is not just struggle of good and evil, but rather the struggle and defeat of evil. All the characters in East of Eden act out this drama and become entangled with its dreadful outcomes. However, each character in East of Eden has different attitudes towards their free will throughout their entanglement with evil. Cathy persists that the world consists of only evil, so she decides to engross herself in it and employ it to her advantage. Cathy learns that she can use evil to exploit other characters human weaknesses to further benefit her own selfish desires. Aaron, on the other hand, is only able to see the good in the world and nothing else. After learning that his mother did not actually die but instead left the boys to be a brothel owner, Aaron is so inundated with emotion that he runs away. Lee is the only character in East of Eden that can be argued to have successfully distanced himself from the drama. However, even Lees story of origin is plagued with immorality and appalling actions. His main role in this drama is to wade in the background quietly reminding the reader that evil can be overcome and that morality is a free choice, regardless of the fact that all humans are imperfect, sinful beings. Cal is a middle road between these two extreme characters. Throughout the story Cal struggles between being evil and good, this is directly seen by his request of Lee, Dont let me be mean (377). Fortunately by the conclusion of the book Cal is successful, as he learns to accept Lees belief of freewill. Although we are never told, it is hoped that Cal later takes this belief with him following the conclusion of the book to live an honest life with Abra. As in all of Steinbecks novels, the character development is at the center of the story. In East of Eden Steinbeck presents characters in pairs: Aaron and Caleb, Abra and Cathy, Adam and Charles; using first initials to initially classify which characters are intrinsically good and which characters will wrestle with the seeds of evil within them. These classifications based on initials refer back to the biblical story of Cain and Abel. Each of the characters beginning with the letter C initially embody evil in the story, while those starting with A embody good. However, as the story progresses the definitive lines of good and evil are blurred by the characters arbitrary actions that go against their characterized name. Steinbeck does this to illustrate his two major points of the novel first that every person sets their own path in life and second that evil can always be overcome. East of Eden embellishes this eternal conflict between good and evil in the simplified set of the Salina s Valley as a whole and more specifically in the individuals of the Trask and Hamilton families. The main characters of the novel, generation after generation, wrestle with the problem of evil. Cyrus, the patriarch of the Trask family, chooses evil by stealing $10,000 throughout his employment at the U.S. War Board. Adam, the protagonist at establishment of the story, is a caring but imperfect character. Adams largest flaws are his propensity to be too naive and his failure to observe evil characteristics in others. It is these flaws that blind him from observing his fathers corruption and Cathys manipulation. As the story progresses and Adam begins to age till finally becoming a father, his figurative character of Abel changes and he leans more towards a metaphorical character of biblical Adam. Adam, like biblical Adam, is incapable to notice his own preferential treatment for Aaron over Cal, which proves damaging to the family. Adam lavishes all of his love and attention on the we ak and detached Aaron while largely writing off the more loving and thoughtful Cal. Ultimately, however, Lee causes Adam to realize Cals potential, and Adam redeems Cal by blessing him at the end of the novel. Cathy chooses the path of evil at every opportunity, hurting and manipulating others for her own benefit. Cathy is the personification of evil in East of Eden and the most stagnant of the main characters. A symbol of barrenness and destruction who kills her parents and attempts to abort her own unborn children, Cathy is a despoiled edition of the biblical Eve, seen in Christian society as the mother of all humankind. Eve is deceived into committing sin, whereas Cathy embraces it enthusiastically and commits evil simply for its own sake. Cathy has a crushingly gloomy outlook on humankind, as she believes that the world is made of evil and, therefore, the only way to live is to embrace it (Barnes 160). Consequently, she falls short in understanding the good in additional characters and instead uses their trusting natures to achieve her own predatory ends. There is never a sense throughout the story that Cathy is actually using her evil acts for an ultimate goal or aim. Due to this aiml ess evil, some critics have dismissed Cathy as an implausible character and a major weak link in Steinbecks novel (Atkinson 210). No matter the analysis by some critics, Cathy is a symbol of the human evil that will always be present in the world, and her loss of power over Adam and Cal strengthens East of Edens message that individuals have the choice to reject evil in favor of good (Mazzeno 30). While Adam is the protagonist throughout most of the novel, the spotlight shifts to Cal in the later chapters. Cal struggles the most of all the characters due to the moral connection he has with his mother. Early on it seems that Cal has inherited the evil tendencies of his mother, Cathy, and that his is destined to fulfill this generations character role of Cain. Early on Cal does display the characteristics of a Cain figure. Cal becomes violently jealous of Aaron because of Adams noticeable inclination towards him, and eventually sets in motion the proceedings that lead to Aarons death, even uttering a parallel of the biblical Cains response to God, Am I my brothers keeper. Although Cal is apparently born into the gloomy role of a modern day Cain, he struggles against what he sees as his inherited evil, the evil of his mother, and even prays to God to put him on the path toward good. Even though Cal does make several pitiable moral choices as he wrestles with evil, in the end he t akes Lees counsel and recognizes the power of timshel, the idea that each individual has the power to choose between good and evil in life (Barnes 162). Thus, while Cal is indeed a Cain figure, he demonstrates the ability to break out of inherited sin and act for good instead. Aaron, like his father, is bighearted and unquestioning. Although Aaron is kind and amiable, his instinctive moral sensitivity is excessive, making him delicate and without doubt vulnerable to being hurt. The protected Aaron encounters tremendous difficulty facing the reality of human evil in the world, and Steinbeck builds a immense amount of suspense in the second half of East of Eden concerning whether or not Aaron will survive his first encounter with his mother. Gradually, Aaron retreats into the shelter of the church, rejecting the love of Abra in favor of religious laws of chastity and devotion. As the novel develops, Aaron becomes less likable, as the reader begins to see that the shelters he seeks are shallow and that his pursuits are driven neither by true religious belief nor a desire for intellectual education (Atkinson 216). Ultimately, Aaron is shattered by the disclosure that Cathy is his supposedly deceased mother. He runs from the evil reality, enlisting in the army, and later is killed in World War I. While the story is plagued by an evil that is native and inevitable to human will, the novel also sets forth optimism that evil may be overcome. Lee, a Chinese servant, surprises and delights the reader with his wisdom and gentle nature. Cathy surpasses the conventional evil character, allowing the reader to feel empathy side by side with revulsion. This dual emotional response was planned by Steinbeck to show that no one person is all good or all evil (Gladstein 36). Steinbeck inculcates the reader that each individual has the freedom to choice evil or good no matter their circumstances. This essential idea of free choice is summarized by the Hebrew word timshel, the final word spoken by Adam in the book before passing away. The Hebrew word, which translates to thou mayest, appears in the story of Cain and Abel in the Bible, and also at the conclusion of East of Eden. In the Genesis four, God instructions Cain to become a master over the evil he wrestles with. Timshel does not mean that he must overcome evil or assure Cain that he will; rather, it reminds Cain of the opportunity to overcome evil exists. Ironically, in the novel, Lee, the Chinese Presbyterian, petitions a group of Confucian scholars to explain the significance of timshel. The novel goes on to narrate that these scholars spent months of reading and studying Hebrew till finally they give Lee the answer: Thou mayest. This single word evolves to become the vortex on which this novel perpetuates. Lee sees this notion of free will as vital to the fallen human condition; in fact, he says that timshel might be the most important word in the world (602). The philosophical discussion of timshel manipulates the psychological struggles of the novel. Through Steinbecks narration of each characters struggle with evil and its affect on the human mind, the reader sees disturbing snapshots of the human souls innate darkness. One example of this is the customers at Kates house of prostitution, who exemplify the varieties of torment and perversion caused by the human mind. Timshel also reveals to the reader hope, in its final appearance in the novel. At the conclusion of the novel when Adam, bedridden by a stroke, murmurs the word to Caleb, following his confession of the evil he has committed by causing Aaron to meet his formerly thought dead mother. Ultimately, the novel ends on a positive note, as Cal accepts the possibility and responsibility of free will, of free choice between good and evil. This optimistic ending is tempered, however, by our knowledge that future generations will endlessly replay the same struggle that Cal and his ancestors have endured. The overriding message of East of Eden seems to be that mankind is free to choose their path regardless of inheritance or circumstances, in fact, perhaps in spite of them.

Presidents of the Vietnam War Essay

President Nixon’s move to end the war in Vietnam and propagate peace there is the most noble move compared to that of the John F. Kennedy’s and Lyndon Johnson, who, at that time have deployed 500,000 soldiers, more than 300 of which are held prisoners. More so, the citizens were divided over the purpose of the war. Nixon plotted a strategy to end America’s involvement in that struggle without sacrificing the dignity that it has upheld in the global scene. With his strong intentions, he was instrumental in the signing of a peace treaty that benefited both countries.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   John F. Kennedy views the war as only a small part of a bigger struggle between freedom and communism, an idea that he widely advertised to the Americans. His stand on America’s defense for freedom in Vietnam is rooted from the legal relationship that it tried hard to uphold. With this, JFK pursued all possibilities of winning the war. His pledge to â€Å"pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and success of liberty† (John F. Kennedy, 1962) was considered ambitious.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Lyndon Johnson’s move to give support to Diem in order to make sure that the waging of war against the communist was not effective in the course of the Vietnam War. His obvious support to continue waging war and sending young soldiers made him the antagonist by many Americans who felt that by doing so, it is synonymous to genocide with a different purpose.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   President Nixon’s intentions handled the Vietnam War best since he made sure that the war was fought in a manner he knows will be a win-win situation to both countries. Works Cited Herring, George C. America’s Longest War The United States and Vietnam, 1950-1975. America in crisis. New York: Wiley, 1979. Small, Melvin. Antiwarriors The Vietnam War and the Battle for America’s Hearts and   Minds. Vietnam–America in the war years, v. 1. Wilmington, Del: Scholarly Resources, 2002.

Geologic Processes